At one with the Banyan in Brisbane botanical gardens
In my first blog on PNGEI I identified a number of issues with the CET (Certificate in Elementary Education) distance mode programme and questioned the capacity of the elementary team to conduct a review of all elementary teacher training programmes. In terms of a progress report all I can say is one step forward, two steps back. Every time I feel we make a real breakthrough as a team and one small step is processed, planned for and on the verge of being acted upon, a proverbial spanner will come wielding its way towards us and lodge itself very firmly in the works.
The spanner is more often than not delivered under the umbrella term of 'protocol'; a marvellous term that can carry a multitude of meanings. I have known it used as an excuse, a threat, a barrier and a necessity. Sometimes the same piece of paper can represent all four depending on whose asking.
In the case of the project I am currently attempting to support, for every activity outlined in the project proposal a terms of reference document must be produced. This must be presented, agreed and signed by a hierarchical line of people four weeks before the activity can begin in order for money to be released. Due to the frequency of blackouts, the limitations of Internet connections and the lack of funds to employ an admin team, this will be achieved (or not) by the project team leader walking from one building to another with the piece of paper. Often the person required to sign the paper is not in their office and the trip is wasted. Frequently there will be a problem with the wording of the document and it must be redrafted. There are also times when the order of protocol is mistaken and individuals are offended and refusal to sign until appropriate behaviour has resumed and sufficient apologies have been received. As you can see there are many pot holes to be surmounted and success is no easy feat.
This is the first donor funded project to be given to PNGEI to lead and the Director and the Elementary Manager are under significant pressure to succeed in actioning activities and spending the money within a timescale in order to maintain in-house control. As the only Institute in PNG training elementary teachers they quite rightly want to have some say in the future of elementary teacher training. This project gives them that voice and they want to shout it loud.
I am a volunteer. I am funded to build the capacity of teacher trainer language lecturers and review the current teacher trainer language programmes. I am a facilitator and a consultant. I share my expertise when appropriate and wanted.
VSO is a well established NGO in PNG. VSO have given education expertise in the form of a volunteer and research training to the elementary team at PNGEI. VSO have committed to giving two more short term volunteers: a researcher and a strategic planner. VSO can also offer a well organised admin team in a well resourced programme office who understand the necessary protocols and can proceed at speed when needed.
The challenge is this. In order to receive two more volunteers the Director of PNGEI must ask for them. For the VSO education programme office to manage the logistics of the project the Director and the Project Manager must agree for the management of the money to be signed over to VSO. In the eyes of PNGEI both these actions signify a loss of control, particularly over the money and a loss of ownership over the project as a whole.
Whether or not PNGEI ask for the support of VSO is there decision. My initial reaction from my experience in my culture is that it's what you might call a 'no brainer', but then this is not my culture, my institute nor my future. I am here to offer the options, nothing more, nothing less the decision making is up to the experts.
The fog lifts for a while then drops again, the mud thickens and thins, the roller coaster rises and falls.
As usual these are just the ramblings of the crazy white meri not to be attributed to anyone else.
Until next time